LBR, PBR, Flooding and Random comparison
This graph shows the delivery ratios from the start of the simulation for MIT-OCT dataset. It would appear that in fact, LBR performs poorly against the random algorithm, where the P is the probability of passing on the message (1 copy) to the met node. Interestingly though, when P = 1, the delivery ratio increases. The graphs below show the delivery cost for the different algorithms, spread across two plots, so that the very high costs of Random and Prophet do not dwarf the lower costs of LBR and PBR. These three plots together show that whilst the delivery ratio of prophet and random are high, the cost is very high.
Delivery costs for three routing algorithms on the MIT-OCT dataset, spread over two plots for clarity.
Perhaps a combined metric for comparison is cost over delivery ratio, this would perhaps give a better idea of general quality of the algorithm.
Casibom Bonus Kodu… Now we’re talking! I’m ALWAYS looking for a good bonus code. Let’s hope it’s a good one! Where’s the code?: casibombonuskodu
DJBajiLive has a great live casino! Feels like you’re actually there. Definitely worth checking if you’re into that kind of thing, get it here: djbajilive